1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 |
I do it every now and again for my official posts. I could do it for everyone. If I automate it it would likely be in a stable diffusion or dall-e style. The ones I made most recently are the new anime style from chatgpt. That's what manual generation would give us.
Here is a dalle style:
https://goatmatrix.net/c/MatrixDev/EQF6vXHf1H
Here is a gpt style:
https://goatmatrix.net/c/TheosOpiumDen/DpAQ9m3pDL
Fun part about using the GPT style if you right click the thumbnail they will have ester eggs in them that wont be in the relatively square thumbnail:
https://img.gvid.tv/i/e8jtJ6gr.png
If I delay generating the thumbnail we can capture some of the comments into the context.
I'm in no way obligating myself to do this but I've made a poll with some fun options.
![]() | ![]() |
---|
At first I was ambivalent.
Then I thought, maybe a trial to see, then a hard decision.
Then I looked and realized the images aren't clear, thus not good, even if elements of the fake art are excellent.
And I was thinking about what I used to do on SaidIt: take the time and effort to find my own thumbnails, and start every text post with [thumbnail] + (link). Usually, but not always, SaidIt would assume the image from the first link.
Then I started to think how lazy it would be to autogenerate more poor noise, low expectations, and disenfranchise real images and creators.
So ultimately, hard no.
A.I. is upon us whether we like it or not. Doesn't mean we have to immediately bend over and take it. There's still time to be discriminating about it, until there isn't.
Can we currently upload a thumbnail for text posts?
I like the thumbnail I got for my poem the other day. Is this auto-generated by AI?
Do it faggot