Yeah, I don't hate anyone. I'm super racist but that's not the same as hate. I just think a lot of the world is defined by ethno-dynamics and genetic behavior. If you understand three things, micro-economics, Machiavellianism, and ethno-specific psychology, you can understand everything that happens in the world.
When you drop bad stereotypes and adopt more nuanced ones you can predict how 90% of a given population will react to anything like clockwork. You couldn't have that level of understanding of people if you had a model of everyone being the same. You have to understand how evolution has driven differences in the foundations of people's psychology. Then you actually understand the world. Developing that understanding doesn't require hating anyone.
That said the jews present an interesting problem. Their evolutionary driver of psychology is that they aren't jews at all but are instead mutt decendents of psychopaths from the social outcasts of every group of people. At least that's true of the Ashkenazi jews. They don't know how to not seek contention even when that contention will as much harm them as others. They will always think they are smart for manipulating others. Sometimes manipulation isn't the most intelligent social strategy, but they will always have a bias toward thinking it is. You could trying to calm relations with them but the next generation will always try to pick a covert fight with someone by instinct. Someone who is always looking for a fight will always be in one, just like dwb when he was here. He had a problem with JC. If somehow he had gotten his way its not like it would have appeased him. Finding contention is his point of existence.
But the scariest part is related to them being kicked out of 109 countries. If you got in 109 fist fights the question is do people pick on you or are you someone who starts fist fights? Most conflicts, even fairly extreme ones, don't usually involve trying to wipe someone out of existence. How many times has Western/Central Europe had war with Eastern Europe. There is a geographic reason for that kind of conflict to happen on loop. Yet never have the Slavs said "we need to exterminate all Germanics" or the Germanics said "We need to exterminate all slavs." Because that's a weird place to take things. But the jews have been in more contests for existence than anyone else. The question is at some point.. do you start contests for existance? If every conflict they have comes to that, while every other group can have entire histories of warfare without that being a thing. Most other groups just want a political outcome. When did the British try to exterminate the Scotts?
So what do you do with a psychopath that has an instinctual need initiate a survival contest over every perceived slight? Or at least a large enough cohort of them fit this psychological bill to create problems?
Same as any individual psychopath. You don't hate them. You understand their problems. But you also understand they are a psychopath and you stop enabling them.
Half the comments here are probably Israeli Intel, their bots, or one of their agents.
They have a virtual monopoly on racial supremacy ideology, and the even post antisemitic garbage, so they can express outrage at their own nonsense.
WW3 was planned to occur in the MiddleEast in the book Morals and Dogma, which was authored by Albert Pike (Halberd Pike), and he was the pope of Masonry of his era.
So, these agitators all have to gin up conflict, so they can bring in their "New Age" by 2030.
Anyone who's not a member of a royal or aristocratic lineage is going to be a slave if they all get their way. Doesn't matter how many degrees that think they have, or passwords, or handshakes.
They'll all be betrayed in the end, just like they betrayed their people for their "brotherhood". Don't take my word for it. Look at what happened to the Bolshevik spies after WW2; they were all exterminated after they returned to Russia.
These "trusted" spies weren't allowed to tell other Russians what had really occurred. Trotsky was Jewish, and they assassinated him too.
If they didn't warn explicitly warn you not to get the jab, then your name is on the list as "cannon fodder". I doubt they actually warned anybody. You were either in the room during the planning, or they're pretending to be your ally.
Hating them is the most counterproductive thing anyone can ever do, especially those from a Christian background.
Not even "for practising Christians" but anyone from such a background.
Hatred is innately part of those humanoids you speak of. It is a virtue to them, they are fueled by it, they thrive on it.
But anybody from a Christian background works on a basis that is diamterically opposite of that. We are fueled by goodness. GOODNESS, not meekness or weakness or gullbility. Still, hatred is quite contrary to this goodness which is at the root of most whites' psyche.
Hating any living being harms the White Christian. It reduces him, weakens him, vilifies him. Therefore hating anything alive, even such abominable creatures as hate-filled humanoids, is toxic.
By hating these Tengu, one gives them power in the form of hate. He makes them more powerful and makes them WIN.
Retaining one's GOODNESS (not weakness or meekness or gullibility!) lets one retain their might, their intelligence and their ability to deal with any problem thrown their way.
Interesting point of view. You said not meekness. Didn't Jesus say to be meek?
I think we might agree on some ideas. What do you think about the idea that whites should strive to be more white. That we aren't inherently our whitest self until we apply effort.
White is sensible, white is balanced, white is caring, white is understanding, white is developed, white is long term thinking, white has multiple modes of intellegence.
This is the problem with negative racism. It degrades the progression of whites on the path of being their whitest self and turns them into creatures with nigger thoughts with white skin. Do they want to become what they hate or do they want to transcend?
I think it's possible to transcend shortsighted emotions while still accepting the ugly or inconvenient parts of reality. Being emotionally developed shouldn't mean sticking your head in the sand to come to socially encouraged conclusions. That's the opposite of being emotionally developed. But so too is becoming emotionally obsessive over people who have differences. So is hating yourself because someone says they will be happier with you if you do.
We live in a world that tells you you have to be in emotionally immature camp A or emotionally immature camp B. And anyone who actually bothers to develop a sane understanding about the world and sane feelings toward that world will be hated by both.
About being "meek"... We, as Whites, are capable of higher discerning critical thought. We can discern when meekness is goodness and when meekness is just giving in to evil. You don't go being meek for the sake of being meek because somebody said it was a virtue. Not as a worthy White, anyway.
Jesus also said, "Think not that I bring peace, for I bring a sword."
Goodness can be seen in the answer to this for example: would you rather work hard, save up under an economically righteous system, and purchase or build your house of choice, or would you prefer to maneuver and strategize with (pseudo-)legal documents to steal someone else's house without actual effort? There's a category of people who go for #2 each and every time.
I fully agree with the rest: denigrating the wrongness of the inferior ones is far from as great as making yourself the epitome of the best virtues one can aspire at attaining. My Great Onkel said so, too.
EDIT: I think Jesus said "Blessed are the meek" and not "act meek"... ;-)
A lot of people misunderstand what the word meekness means in that context. Unfortunately words change meaning over time in modern parlance. Meekness as it was intended to be translated there means self control, not weakness. It's basically like stoic strength.
I can't think of a context where I shouldn't want stoic strength.
I do nto believe whites are reduced weakened or vilified by halting a mosquito.
Hatred is as good as Love. For if there are things worthy of love that have things that harm it, then these things are worthy of hate, or the relationship is.
I think you're a spiteful mutant or disguised enemy at best.
How about you make a video of retaining your goodness while being eaten by a crocodile? We'll be able to measure your ability to deal with a crocodile thrown your way, to start before we even consider your leadership in such ideas.
I hate evil actions, agendas, ideas, and ideologies, including Zionism, Wahhabism, Brahmanism, Neoconservativism, Neoliberalism, Usury, Eugenics, New Eugenics, Supremacy, Wokism, etc.
Log in
Yeah, I don't hate anyone. I'm super racist but that's not the same as hate. I just think a lot of the world is defined by ethno-dynamics and genetic behavior. If you understand three things, micro-economics, Machiavellianism, and ethno-specific psychology, you can understand everything that happens in the world.
When you drop bad stereotypes and adopt more nuanced ones you can predict how 90% of a given population will react to anything like clockwork. You couldn't have that level of understanding of people if you had a model of everyone being the same. You have to understand how evolution has driven differences in the foundations of people's psychology. Then you actually understand the world. Developing that understanding doesn't require hating anyone.
That said the jews present an interesting problem. Their evolutionary driver of psychology is that they aren't jews at all but are instead mutt decendents of psychopaths from the social outcasts of every group of people. At least that's true of the Ashkenazi jews. They don't know how to not seek contention even when that contention will as much harm them as others. They will always think they are smart for manipulating others. Sometimes manipulation isn't the most intelligent social strategy, but they will always have a bias toward thinking it is. You could trying to calm relations with them but the next generation will always try to pick a covert fight with someone by instinct. Someone who is always looking for a fight will always be in one, just like dwb when he was here. He had a problem with JC. If somehow he had gotten his way its not like it would have appeased him. Finding contention is his point of existence.
But the scariest part is related to them being kicked out of 109 countries. If you got in 109 fist fights the question is do people pick on you or are you someone who starts fist fights? Most conflicts, even fairly extreme ones, don't usually involve trying to wipe someone out of existence. How many times has Western/Central Europe had war with Eastern Europe. There is a geographic reason for that kind of conflict to happen on loop. Yet never have the Slavs said "we need to exterminate all Germanics" or the Germanics said "We need to exterminate all slavs." Because that's a weird place to take things. But the jews have been in more contests for existence than anyone else. The question is at some point.. do you start contests for existance? If every conflict they have comes to that, while every other group can have entire histories of warfare without that being a thing. Most other groups just want a political outcome. When did the British try to exterminate the Scotts?
So what do you do with a psychopath that has an instinctual need initiate a survival contest over every perceived slight? Or at least a large enough cohort of them fit this psychological bill to create problems?
Same as any individual psychopath. You don't hate them. You understand their problems. But you also understand they are a psychopath and you stop enabling them.
How common do you think Machiavellianism is among jews?
Half the comments here are probably Israeli Intel, their bots, or one of their agents.
They have a virtual monopoly on racial supremacy ideology, and the even post antisemitic garbage, so they can express outrage at their own nonsense.
WW3 was planned to occur in the MiddleEast in the book Morals and Dogma, which was authored by Albert Pike (Halberd Pike), and he was the pope of Masonry of his era.
So, these agitators all have to gin up conflict, so they can bring in their "New Age" by 2030.
Anyone who's not a member of a royal or aristocratic lineage is going to be a slave if they all get their way. Doesn't matter how many degrees that think they have, or passwords, or handshakes.
They'll all be betrayed in the end, just like they betrayed their people for their "brotherhood". Don't take my word for it. Look at what happened to the Bolshevik spies after WW2; they were all exterminated after they returned to Russia.
These "trusted" spies weren't allowed to tell other Russians what had really occurred. Trotsky was Jewish, and they assassinated him too.
If they didn't warn explicitly warn you not to get the jab, then your name is on the list as "cannon fodder". I doubt they actually warned anybody. You were either in the room during the planning, or they're pretending to be your ally.
I'm just saying.
Hating them is the most counterproductive thing anyone can ever do, especially those from a Christian background.
Not even "for practising Christians" but anyone from such a background.
Hatred is innately part of those humanoids you speak of. It is a virtue to them, they are fueled by it, they thrive on it.
But anybody from a Christian background works on a basis that is diamterically opposite of that. We are fueled by goodness. GOODNESS, not meekness or weakness or gullbility. Still, hatred is quite contrary to this goodness which is at the root of most whites' psyche.
Hating any living being harms the White Christian. It reduces him, weakens him, vilifies him. Therefore hating anything alive, even such abominable creatures as hate-filled humanoids, is toxic.
By hating these Tengu, one gives them power in the form of hate. He makes them more powerful and makes them WIN.
Retaining one's GOODNESS (not weakness or meekness or gullibility!) lets one retain their might, their intelligence and their ability to deal with any problem thrown their way.
Interesting point of view. You said not meekness. Didn't Jesus say to be meek?
I think we might agree on some ideas. What do you think about the idea that whites should strive to be more white. That we aren't inherently our whitest self until we apply effort.
White is sensible, white is balanced, white is caring, white is understanding, white is developed, white is long term thinking, white has multiple modes of intellegence.
This is the problem with negative racism. It degrades the progression of whites on the path of being their whitest self and turns them into creatures with nigger thoughts with white skin. Do they want to become what they hate or do they want to transcend?
I think it's possible to transcend shortsighted emotions while still accepting the ugly or inconvenient parts of reality. Being emotionally developed shouldn't mean sticking your head in the sand to come to socially encouraged conclusions. That's the opposite of being emotionally developed. But so too is becoming emotionally obsessive over people who have differences. So is hating yourself because someone says they will be happier with you if you do.
We live in a world that tells you you have to be in emotionally immature camp A or emotionally immature camp B. And anyone who actually bothers to develop a sane understanding about the world and sane feelings toward that world will be hated by both.
About being "meek"... We, as Whites, are capable of higher discerning critical thought. We can discern when meekness is goodness and when meekness is just giving in to evil. You don't go being meek for the sake of being meek because somebody said it was a virtue. Not as a worthy White, anyway.
Jesus also said, "Think not that I bring peace, for I bring a sword."
Goodness can be seen in the answer to this for example: would you rather work hard, save up under an economically righteous system, and purchase or build your house of choice, or would you prefer to maneuver and strategize with (pseudo-)legal documents to steal someone else's house without actual effort? There's a category of people who go for #2 each and every time.
I fully agree with the rest: denigrating the wrongness of the inferior ones is far from as great as making yourself the epitome of the best virtues one can aspire at attaining. My Great Onkel said so, too.
EDIT: I think Jesus said "Blessed are the meek" and not "act meek"... ;-)
A lot of people misunderstand what the word meekness means in that context. Unfortunately words change meaning over time in modern parlance. Meekness as it was intended to be translated there means self control, not weakness. It's basically like stoic strength.
I can't think of a context where I shouldn't want stoic strength.
Those with meekness are those that act meek.
I do nto believe whites are reduced weakened or vilified by halting a mosquito.
Hatred is as good as Love. For if there are things worthy of love that have things that harm it, then these things are worthy of hate, or the relationship is.
I think you're a spiteful mutant or disguised enemy at best.
How about you make a video of retaining your goodness while being eaten by a crocodile? We'll be able to measure your ability to deal with a crocodile thrown your way, to start before we even consider your leadership in such ideas.
I don't hate anyone I haven't met.
I hate evil actions, agendas, ideas, and ideologies, including Zionism, Wahhabism, Brahmanism, Neoconservativism, Neoliberalism, Usury, Eugenics, New Eugenics, Supremacy, Wokism, etc.
I've dated a bunch of kikes, niggers too
Sephardic jews are sexy, period.