AnnouncementsMatrixEventsFunnyVideosMusicAncapsTechnologyEconomicsPrivacyGIFSCringeAnarchyFilmPicsThemesIdeas4MatrixAskMatrixHelpTop Subs
3

The newly released MLK assassination files (July 2025) don’t give you a smoking gun and they were designed not to.

If you look for yourself, you will see that thousands and thousands of sheets are merely indices; cover pages for more documents. The documents they refer to are not present in the release.

What they do is show a pattern—a systemic design to neutralize a threat without ever pulling a trigger directly. This pattern didn't arise out of nowhere; this was intelligence firing on all cylinders using a practiced set of operating procedures that can be used to analyze other efforts on other figures.

Martin Luther King wasn’t just killed. He was boxed in, softened up, and left exposed. His death was the final link in a chain that was forged by the very agencies tasked with protecting democracy.

This isn’t about hero-worship or conspiracy fantasy. It’s about recognizing how national security frameworks get turned inward—and asking who they’re pointing at now.


🕵️‍♂️ 1. MLK Was a Targeted National Security Concern, Not a Civic Hero

Long before the bullet, King was:

  • Tracked by the FBI, NSA, CIA, Army Intelligence, and foreign partners.
  • Targeted by COINTELPRO, under the category of “Black Nationalist Hate Groups”—alongside the Klan.
  • Tied by association (not ideology) to communists and pacifists the state saw as subversive.

📁 The newly released indices reference thousands of case files, many of which are either unreleased or destroyed. You don’t bury harmless intel.


2. Military Surveillance in Memphis: Not a Theory Anymore

The release confirms that:

  • The 111th Military Intelligence Group had plainclothes assets on the ground in Memphis on April 4, 1968.
  • A sniper team from the 20th Special Forces Group (Operation Detachment Alpha, aka Alpha 184) was also in Memphis—in civilian clothes, deployed under a vague “standby observation” order.
  • Spotters and/or photographers were positioned on rooftops with direct line of sight to the Lorraine Motel.
  • Regular police security for King was pulled an hour before the shooting, on orders that remain unaccounted for.

If this were a foreign capital and we had SIGINT showing this pattern, we’d call it state-sanctioned destabilization. Here? We are expected to call it coincidence.


🔇 3. James Earl Ray Wasn’t Acting Alone—If He Even Acted

The Ray story never made sense. Now we know:

  • He had fake passports, overseas travel, cash—none of which aligns with his criminal profile.
  • His handler “Raoul” is referenced in multiple files, then disappears.
  • Multiple witnesses described a second man fleeing or in position—never followed up.
  • Cross-agency cables from Canada, UK, and Portugal show Ray flagged abroad, but the U.S. response was strangely subdued.

The case against Ray was clean because it had to be. The documents show pressure to shut doors—not open them.


🛏️ 4. MLK's Flaws Were Weaponized—That Doesn’t Make the Weapons Honest

Was King flawed? Sure. Infidelity? Documented. Strategic ego? Of course.

The FBI:

  • Used wiretaps to compile graphic sexual dossiers.
  • Sent him the infamous “suicide letter.”
  • Alleged that he laughed during a rape committed by an associate— based on an agent’s memo.

The point wasn’t to expose truth. It was to destroy influence.
That’s what counterintelligence does.


🧠 5. What Does This Mean for Today?

If you think this all ended in 1968, you haven’t been paying attention.

Every era has multiple MLKs... people who:

  • Unify groups the establishment wants divided.
  • Bridges class, race, ideology, or geography.
  • Challenges war, monetary policy, intelligence legitimacy, or corporate-state collusion.

Ask yourself:

  • Why did Julian Assange have his communications tapped by U.S. intel inside an embassy?
  • Why are domestic activists against foreign wars or Federal Reserve policy flagged by fusion centers and given “domestic violent extremist” labels?
  • Why are figures like RFK Jr., Glenn Greenwald, or even Tulsi Gabbard routinely linked with foreign subversion, even when their positions are rooted in U.S. law or civil rights?

I’m not endorsing these people. I’m saying watch the pattern and be alert for recursive infiltration where agencies are watching their own assets.

If someone builds cross-spectrum support, challenges military or pharma-industrial interests, and questions surveillance or censorship—they’re in the same box King was.


🧾 Final Assessment (From Someone Who’s Been Inside the Room)

  • King was under coordinated federal surveillance.
  • Military assets were deployed at his location.
  • Police were pulled right before the shot.
  • The scapegoat’s story doesn’t hold.
  • And the files? Still incomplete.

That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s counterintelligence logic.

And if it happened then, it's happening now.


Watch what they redact. And never trust a case that closes too neatly. There are still a million or more pages referenced by the indices that appear that they will never see the light of day; another limited hang out.

Comment preview