1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 |
it wasn't good. i think it was poorly done and wasn't thoroughly researched. i don't think there is an internet personality that deserves criticsm more than h3h3 but the points made on the video didn't scratch the surface on getting to the root of why h3 is insane. i hope there's a part 2 because that was underwhelming and gave h3 a lot of wiggle room to dance around the weak points that were made.
the most egregious thing h3 did was filing lawsuits against other youtube channels that critisized his content which threatens the entire genre of work they do. that was barely touched on and instead ian went on about their minor personal problems with him
also annoying is this hypocritical than thou persona h3 has which makes no sense considering his entire channel is dedicated to smearing and insulting people. he is hyper sensitive to criticism but can't take any back even if he gets minor pushback.
it's not as if h3 is immune to controversy. his own fans have turned against him several times for his hijinks yet wants everybody else to be innocent as a lamb.
he's probably the most disliked internet personality on the web and has had the greatest decline in favorability and this would have been a good chance to skewer him but instead it basically an intervention for somebody who doesn't deserve it
i hope we get a part 2 because that sucked balls
So why waste more time on it?
Seems like you're also trying to suck balls.
I'm not sure if I've seen the h3h3 content he did but I have watched very little content cop and I'd say I have a lot of the same impression off of what I've watched.
Seems like stretched out content low research. What is the highest ratio of video time to research done I can get? Turns out very high.