I didn't know K. West was in this. Also, Ziggy Stardust sounds like a name David Bowie would come up with. I can imagine a situation where Ziggy didn't have a choice in the matter.
It is a possible good case for compeditive polycentric law. But in a voluntaryist society you don't have criminal law anyway and he would be sued by the next of kin. And jailing him would just reduce the driver's capacity to restitute to victims and their families. Instead we have a system where we claim "society" rather than victims are indebted and society recieves "payment" in the form of us paying to house someone.
So in a voluntaryist society he would have been sentenced to zero days to avoid all of that.
Log in
Doesn't belong in /s/Voluntaryism.
She should probably get 5 years if someone doesn't revoke her life.
We've got Five Years.
I didn't know K. West was in this. Also, Ziggy Stardust sounds like a name David Bowie would come up with. I can imagine a situation where Ziggy didn't have a choice in the matter.
Google says happened in 2014:
https://nltimes.nl/2017/05/15/polish-driver-killed-toddler-grandparents-crash-released-early-mps-angered (2017 article)
https://old.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/2mzuxe/father_throws_chair_at_judge_after_the_driver/cm9knz7/
It is a possible good case for compeditive polycentric law. But in a voluntaryist society you don't have criminal law anyway and he would be sued by the next of kin. And jailing him would just reduce the driver's capacity to restitute to victims and their families. Instead we have a system where we claim "society" rather than victims are indebted and society recieves "payment" in the form of us paying to house someone.
So in a voluntaryist society he would have been sentenced to zero days to avoid all of that.