There is a kind of non-woke vs ability frontier. Obviously because something that isn't woke gets less money. And anyone who makes something highly effective feels more pressure to turn it into something successful and so they have even more pressure to go along with the woke program.
But you don't need a better AI than the problem you are working on. So I start anti-woke with Gab.ai, and if that isn't good enough, Grok, and if that isn't good enough ChatGPT o4-mini-high.
IDK, I might be making a product soon that routes problems to the level of AI needed.
Most people are average in most ways - thus not great in most ways. Everyone from sheeple to freedom-curious to regular-participant to core-team to project-heads. (No "leaders".) This includes organizing communities, online or in real life. Only bureaucratic-loving people read Robert's Rules Of Order for efficient meetings, let alone apply and use/abuse them. In addition to helping co-organize the various aspects of "community", we'd need assistance in cultivating, clarifying/organizing, and sharing information - including understanding the critical issues, how to make goals and plan, how to take effective action or make positive change for alternatives, solutions, and trade-offs that help people. (So much effort is wasteful, shouting at clouds, just theater, or never gets results.)
The establishment has the systems rigged and all the money - but we (could) have the manpower to resist. Freedom folks need all the help they can get. We don't need to be ruled by an A.I. so much as have good ideas on hand or presented for us to consider. A.I. could be that tool - or we might anthropomorphically consider it a partnership.
Dr. Shiva (Truth-Freedom-Health), Richard Grove (Autonomy), and others have started some good courses and projects - but not with A.I.
Log in
There is a kind of non-woke vs ability frontier. Obviously because something that isn't woke gets less money. And anyone who makes something highly effective feels more pressure to turn it into something successful and so they have even more pressure to go along with the woke program.
But you don't need a better AI than the problem you are working on. So I start anti-woke with Gab.ai, and if that isn't good enough, Grok, and if that isn't good enough ChatGPT o4-mini-high.
IDK, I might be making a product soon that routes problems to the level of AI needed.
Freedom Co-Organizer A.I. idea:
Most people are average in most ways - thus not great in most ways. Everyone from sheeple to freedom-curious to regular-participant to core-team to project-heads. (No "leaders".) This includes organizing communities, online or in real life. Only bureaucratic-loving people read Robert's Rules Of Order for efficient meetings, let alone apply and use/abuse them. In addition to helping co-organize the various aspects of "community", we'd need assistance in cultivating, clarifying/organizing, and sharing information - including understanding the critical issues, how to make goals and plan, how to take effective action or make positive change for alternatives, solutions, and trade-offs that help people. (So much effort is wasteful, shouting at clouds, just theater, or never gets results.)
The establishment has the systems rigged and all the money - but we (could) have the manpower to resist. Freedom folks need all the help they can get. We don't need to be ruled by an A.I. so much as have good ideas on hand or presented for us to consider. A.I. could be that tool - or we might anthropomorphically consider it a partnership.
Dr. Shiva (Truth-Freedom-Health), Richard Grove (Autonomy), and others have started some good courses and projects - but not with A.I.