Question Time is a popular show on Thursdays in a different UK city each week where an audience with politically diverse backgrounds (or so they claim in their applications) ask politicians and journalist questions. It's funded by a TV tax. The person commenting is Oli Dugmore, a far left journalist aligned with Jeremy Corbyn, both of whom are famous for attacking every political party for not being far left. They're useless and haven't a clue about how government works. Oli is executive editor for the left-wing New Statesmen, which is a very good magazine (mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-statesman), despite Oli's recent promotion. I mean, for him to say that Labour promotes party members BECAUSE they're pedophiles is utter nonsense. Mandelson should probably but in jail, but Oli makes the 'left' look like lunatics when arguing such bullshit. It's obviously wrong what Labour did, but they didn't fancy pedophiles. Come on...
Re. Starmer knowing about Epstein's guests - one explanation is that Mandelson has been in his position because of his connections to powerful people, some of them likely connected with Epstein, but not necessarily diddling children. People with Mandelson's connections are also in the Epstein files. In politics, corruption is so widespread that those with the most powerful connections are not boyscouts, but will have to step down if they are discovered (unless they're in the US Executive Branch). We've learned that Epstein was connected to the most powerful people in the world. Some of them are unavoidable for those who need to arrange geopolitical deals.
Re. Corbyn and similar lefties - there was a lot of hope in them for a long period and they were so useless as to convince some people they were working for the Tories, by putting up no reasonable challenges to Tory abuses.
I've not read about the Ukrainian male models. Perhaps I'll see that soon enough.
Log in
Question Time is a popular show on Thursdays in a different UK city each week where an audience with politically diverse backgrounds (or so they claim in their applications) ask politicians and journalist questions. It's funded by a TV tax. The person commenting is Oli Dugmore, a far left journalist aligned with Jeremy Corbyn, both of whom are famous for attacking every political party for not being far left. They're useless and haven't a clue about how government works. Oli is executive editor for the left-wing New Statesmen, which is a very good magazine (mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-statesman), despite Oli's recent promotion. I mean, for him to say that Labour promotes party members BECAUSE they're pedophiles is utter nonsense. Mandelson should probably but in jail, but Oli makes the 'left' look like lunatics when arguing such bullshit. It's obviously wrong what Labour did, but they didn't fancy pedophiles. Come on...
WTF? Starmer knew about this stuff, he would know he was compromised. Oli and Corbyn sound based and at least somewhat principled.
What's up with those 5 Ukrainian male models who were busted breaking into Starmer's house?
Re. Starmer knowing about Epstein's guests - one explanation is that Mandelson has been in his position because of his connections to powerful people, some of them likely connected with Epstein, but not necessarily diddling children. People with Mandelson's connections are also in the Epstein files. In politics, corruption is so widespread that those with the most powerful connections are not boyscouts, but will have to step down if they are discovered (unless they're in the US Executive Branch). We've learned that Epstein was connected to the most powerful people in the world. Some of them are unavoidable for those who need to arrange geopolitical deals.
Re. Corbyn and similar lefties - there was a lot of hope in them for a long period and they were so useless as to convince some people they were working for the Tories, by putting up no reasonable challenges to Tory abuses.
I've not read about the Ukrainian male models. Perhaps I'll see that soon enough.