I think it's interesting that you have Lunduke in there. There are people who are anti-Lunduke and usually they are pieces of shit. But part of me does seem him as not being as topical to the an article called Open Source while there is a lot missing that isn't controversial. Suggestion one is to fill in the article more covering history like GNU, Linux, Herd, BSD, Netscape, and technologies that shape the ecosystem now like git.
Then like a standard wiki article you could have a controversies section and have some Lunduke. You might want to fit in some other things like Oracle taking over MySQL and OpenOffice. Maybe you could write something about licensing rug pulls that happen when something is initially labeled for personal and commercial, and then in some update it changes, and this could be down an NPM tree where you aren't even seeing what software is being installed.
Generally the point of WikiSpooks is not to be a typical encyclopedia, like Wikipedia (usually topically linked from WikiSpooks), with detailed articles about all aspects of a topic. The point is to expose, document, and focus on the levers of power, connections, controversies, and corruptions of everything - especially the deep state.
The Wikipedia "Open-source" general article I instigated (to clarify between software, license, model, movement, and other things as well as to list all the lesser known non-software developments like OS farm equipment, ethics, cola, government, etc.) and that article we Wikipedians developed was IMO better in late 2018 and early 2019. Regardless, new or old, that article is good enough for general knowledge. But Wikipedia won't allow too much content calling out the cultural Marxism infiltration and subversion - so WikiSpooks is the best place to focus on that aspect.
I know a bit, but I don't know much about GNU, Linux, Herd, BSD, Netscape, technologies, the ecosystem, nor git. I guess these are blind spots for me, and if documented on Wikipedia, I don't have anything to add or write - unless censored issues or different perspectives need to be shared.
A couple weeks ago I started The Lunduke Journal article. I also started the CRT, DEI, ESG, and other articles missing and updating a lot related to the woke culture wars - with his content. It also affects the technocracy, security, surveillance, censorship, etc. etc. etc. You know all this, but it's frightening to understand how they're infiltrating not just the media, economics, and judicial systems - but the very tools we all depend upon.
I knew about OpenOffice - thus LibreOffice, but not much more. Some things I remember and some never. And who has time to properly document and present all the nonsense happening? I just try to post on GoatMatrix, Projex.Wiki, and WikiSpooks when I can. I'm certainly all game to learn about and write on any topic. For tech stuff I may need some leads, direction, and/or assistance.
In 2018, I'd already broke Wikipedia by compelling the clarification article, and with help we had to reorganize more than a few thousand articles and various divergent aspects of "open-source", so it wasn't difficult to summarize it all again in this much shorter article.
Log in
I think it's interesting that you have Lunduke in there. There are people who are anti-Lunduke and usually they are pieces of shit. But part of me does seem him as not being as topical to the an article called Open Source while there is a lot missing that isn't controversial. Suggestion one is to fill in the article more covering history like GNU, Linux, Herd, BSD, Netscape, and technologies that shape the ecosystem now like git.
Then like a standard wiki article you could have a controversies section and have some Lunduke. You might want to fit in some other things like Oracle taking over MySQL and OpenOffice. Maybe you could write something about licensing rug pulls that happen when something is initially labeled for personal and commercial, and then in some update it changes, and this could be down an NPM tree where you aren't even seeing what software is being installed.
Thanks for the feedback!
Generally the point of WikiSpooks is not to be a typical encyclopedia, like Wikipedia (usually topically linked from WikiSpooks), with detailed articles about all aspects of a topic. The point is to expose, document, and focus on the levers of power, connections, controversies, and corruptions of everything - especially the deep state.
The Wikipedia "Open-source" general article I instigated (to clarify between software, license, model, movement, and other things as well as to list all the lesser known non-software developments like OS farm equipment, ethics, cola, government, etc.) and that article we Wikipedians developed was IMO better in late 2018 and early 2019. Regardless, new or old, that article is good enough for general knowledge. But Wikipedia won't allow too much content calling out the cultural Marxism infiltration and subversion - so WikiSpooks is the best place to focus on that aspect.
I know a bit, but I don't know much about GNU, Linux, Herd, BSD, Netscape, technologies, the ecosystem, nor git. I guess these are blind spots for me, and if documented on Wikipedia, I don't have anything to add or write - unless censored issues or different perspectives need to be shared.
A couple weeks ago I started The Lunduke Journal article. I also started the CRT, DEI, ESG, and other articles missing and updating a lot related to the woke culture wars - with his content. It also affects the technocracy, security, surveillance, censorship, etc. etc. etc. You know all this, but it's frightening to understand how they're infiltrating not just the media, economics, and judicial systems - but the very tools we all depend upon.
I knew about OpenOffice - thus LibreOffice, but not much more. Some things I remember and some never. And who has time to properly document and present all the nonsense happening? I just try to post on GoatMatrix, Projex.Wiki, and WikiSpooks when I can. I'm certainly all game to learn about and write on any topic. For tech stuff I may need some leads, direction, and/or assistance.
In 2018, I'd already broke Wikipedia by compelling the clarification article, and with help we had to reorganize more than a few thousand articles and various divergent aspects of "open-source", so it wasn't difficult to summarize it all again in this much shorter article.