How can they verify the verification?
Trying to listen but am distracted by her messy room.
They can't verify the verification, a 12 year old will enter they are 50 to access adult content.
But if we could track adults everywhere from the web to the OS we could make sure none of the traffic was from children or clankers. They know what solution they want. The keep creating problems to get there.
What if your child wanted to send you a picture of their art from school, but blocked because they are a child?
Q: What if your child wanted to send you a picture of their art from school, but blocked because they are a child?
A: Kill the child for forbidden freedom of expression.
They wouldn't be dressing it up as something to protect children if it wasn't a bad law. Since when do they care about that anyway?
It doesn't protect children, it is a band-aid at best.
IFIFY:
It doesn't protect children at all in any meaningful way, it is lip-service at best.
It is the best that Democrats have come up with. I remember on Windows there was Net Nanny.
Same then as now.
The best protection children can get is from parental supervision. Always was. Always will be.
I agree, we used parental supervision on our son when he was young. He had full access to the Internet but we watched him.
Won't you think of the Epsteins?!?
Log in
How can they verify the verification?
Trying to listen but am distracted by her messy room.
They can't verify the verification, a 12 year old will enter they are 50 to access adult content.
But if we could track adults everywhere from the web to the OS we could make sure none of the traffic was from children or clankers. They know what solution they want. The keep creating problems to get there.
What if your child wanted to send you a picture of their art from school, but blocked because they are a child?
Q: What if your child wanted to send you a picture of their art from school, but blocked because they are a child?
A: Kill the child for forbidden freedom of expression.
They wouldn't be dressing it up as something to protect children if it wasn't a bad law. Since when do they care about that anyway?
It doesn't protect children, it is a band-aid at best.
IFIFY:
It doesn't protect children at all in any meaningful way, it is lip-service at best.
It is the best that Democrats have come up with. I remember on Windows there was Net Nanny.
Same then as now.
The best protection children can get is from parental supervision.
Always was.
Always will be.
I agree, we used parental supervision on our son when he was young. He had full access to the Internet but we watched him.
Won't you think of the Epsteins?!?