Log in
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 |
Is he just an indefatigable leftist/neoliberal with a humiliation fetish? Is he one person or many? Is he even a person at all, or a bot? Is the socks account a paid shill? What is the purpose or mission of this user of infinite usernames? Give me your theories.
Doesn't really matter how you define or label him/it/her/them.
He's blue-no-matter-who into political team water-sports and losing pissing contests while full of shit.
socks claimed to be a Quaker living in Europe and shared little else about themselves.
In my estimation socks should be considered a chaos-agent threat who means to do harm to SaidIt, freedom, and online communities. I'd say ban socks but then it's whack-a-mole with aliases - so it's better to simply flag his account with a warning so folks may ignore him. (SaidIt's block feature is very incomplete and until it's improved it's a failure.) This flagging might not be a bad thing to do with all users, perhaps via openly voting on attributes, though I suppose anything with enough users/aliases could be abused/weaponized, so maybe just labelled from on high with subjective benevolence.
And yet a screenshot he shared once revealed him to be a pajeet. So we know he's full of shit. I do in fact think he's a paid shill and it wouldn't surprise me if he was on a CIA payroll, although it could just as well be another organization. But Operation Mockingbird is a thing, as was Radio Free Asia. They do pay people to propagandize so it makes sense for that to carry over into the Internet age. He seems a bit too advanced to be an LLM but could be AI-assisted. You can test this by pm'ing him a link that keeps track of when it was clicked. If it's clicked within a second you've found an AI.
Interesting. Have you got it? How was this determined? How long ago? In your opinion does this change anything? What did others say?
People pondered if socks might have various controllers, but I suspect he might just have moods - especially since his selective memory would remember interactions (but not slam dunks on his idiocy).
Always was.
He's too well-versed and basically intelligent enough not to know better.
I almost wish he was actually smarter with better than fallacious arguments to challenge me/us with rather than being just a timesucking STaB (Shills, Trolls, and Bots).
Either he's paid by (((The Establishment))) or he's delusionally partisan and authoritarian - either way he's a tool. He won't ever answer my fundamental question that strike to the core of his problem: "Why does socks believe in the authorities, government, and the corporate media despite the endless deception, manipulation, and exploitation?"
Interesting. TIL. Thanks.
A faggot.
Accurate.