I think he was supposed to have been killed on that day.
Sounds like someone who knew him gave him the best possible advice, and prevented him from being murdered by the State.
Now the State is forced to put him on trial because this allows them to kick the can, so they can pretend Israel is an Ally.
Their strategy to get the US public to support the Iran war was to eliminate the most vocal conservative opposition, because he influenced the fighting age conservative Americans.
The wheels have fallen off the war bus, and it's probably a good thing they didn't finish the Mexico border wall.
Millions of young Americans might be headed for the southern border.
People complain about immigration over the southern border. I wonder how Mexico might handle an invasion of Americans from the north. They'll probably be unarmed, because they're trying to avoid combat.
I think it's very interesting that it's difficult to locate a commonly known explanation for the reason that Robinson shot Kirk, and that a lot of what we might learn about that is actively restricted from public view. To me it smells of a decades-old strategy for controlling information about assassinations. Central to the theories for who controls that information has been Israel and associated politicians and wealthy individuals. Did Robinson act alone? Nope. We should be looking for the group that influenced Robinson. And we can think of other assassinations involving impressive marksmen. I mean, it's not so common to be that accurate at 200+ yards. There are so many questions in this case.
Yeah - Israel's government tried to disassociate themselves from a shooting that they should not have discussed, and it's not clear to me if that was unintentional or intentional.
Log in
I think he was supposed to have been killed on that day.
Sounds like someone who knew him gave him the best possible advice, and prevented him from being murdered by the State.
Now the State is forced to put him on trial because this allows them to kick the can, so they can pretend Israel is an Ally.
Their strategy to get the US public to support the Iran war was to eliminate the most vocal conservative opposition, because he influenced the fighting age conservative Americans.
The wheels have fallen off the war bus, and it's probably a good thing they didn't finish the Mexico border wall.
Millions of young Americans might be headed for the southern border.
People complain about immigration over the southern border. I wonder how Mexico might handle an invasion of Americans from the north. They'll probably be unarmed, because they're trying to avoid combat.
Probably.
I think it's very interesting that it's difficult to locate a commonly known explanation for the reason that Robinson shot Kirk, and that a lot of what we might learn about that is actively restricted from public view. To me it smells of a decades-old strategy for controlling information about assassinations. Central to the theories for who controls that information has been Israel and associated politicians and wealthy individuals. Did Robinson act alone? Nope. We should be looking for the group that influenced Robinson. And we can think of other assassinations involving impressive marksmen. I mean, it's not so common to be that accurate at 200+ yards. There are so many questions in this case.
I haven't seen any credible evidence Robinson was directly involved. He's a Patsy.
Then the Israel prime minister instantly went on a media campaign specifically staying that he wasn't involved. Confession by projection?
Everyone keeps blaming this fellow for all kinds of tragedies, just because he has an unfortunate name, Len Gone-Mann.
Robinson or Bibi Mileikowsky?
Yeah - Israel's government tried to disassociate themselves from a shooting that they should not have discussed, and it's not clear to me if that was unintentional or intentional.
I think most shootings are done by training a patsy to do it by the CIA.
Will be found not guilty due to retardation and not knowing right from wrong, like all the rest.
The official narrative is crap.