90% of the world's population lives within 50 miles if the ocean coast.
During the ice age (13000 years ago) the ocean sea level was about 350 feet lower than it's curent level, because a +5000 ft thick sheets of glaciated ice covered large regions of the northern continents. The water was frozen high-above sea level.
Continental coastlines extended for over 100 miles on the east coast, and Florida extended to the extended coast of Cuba, etc. Similar conditions existed on coast lines everywhere around the world.
A mass solar coronal ejection likely ended the ice age. High energy plasma was ejected from the sun traveled for a few days towards the earth, and darkened the sun (as viewed from earth). This ionized material would have accumulated at the magnetic poles of the earth, and generated storms of literal biblical proportions, which rained down biblically epic lightning through the poles; melting the glaciers from the bottom-up. This would dislodge then and cause biblical flooding; permanently changing the sea level and producing the coastline we recognize today.
The 90% of people living within 50 miles is the coast would not survive the flooding event, which coincided with unimaginably bad weather.
The solar plasma event wouldn't leave any significant evidence of the incident, with the exception of vitrified stone, which is identified on the around the pyramids, at various locations.
The solar storm would exceed the Carrington event by orders of magnitude, and magnetic induction would melt almost all metal that wasn't fully grounded (underground).
This would demolish the existing superiorly-advanced civilizations that existed at the time; which had already developed the technological means to build the pyramids, etc. Which we still cannot reproduce.
Atlantis likely real, as Plato documented it existed 9000 years before his time. This lines up with the end of the ice age. It's likely located under the ocean near the Canary islands.
I don’t think that’s too crazy. It’s pretty out there. But for things that are far out there I’d believe some of it.
Atlantis definitely existed. Sometimes real stories merge into myths. For all we know there was more than one Atlantis and myth about these cities became one.
For me a am very interested in near pre-historic history. There was so much going on with humanity then. Our most important advancements.
And the advancement of different peoples is not going to be fair at all, especially when there would be more genetic distinction back then. And a lot of that would be lost.
All we would have in the Bronze Age of this would be myth.
Civilization was far more advanced broadly in the pre Bronze Age than most realize. We see evidence of this in the level of global trade at the time. Even in the late Neolithic Northern Europe has herdsmen of reindeer and established trade villages. All the way to the near modern era you would have the village as the basic societal unit in the same area for the next ~50,000 years.
So you can’t say people then didn’t have civilization just because they didn’t have bronze, didn’t have writing that we know about, and at least in that area lived in something smaller that what could be called a “city.” The people who define a city as the definition of civilization clearly have never lived outside of one. Never mind the fact that there were plenty of cities pre-bronze age and even undiscovered ones. You point out the issue with the changing ocean level.
There has been a propaganda level effort to really push a narrative that Bronze Age Middle East really was the the start of our story.
Humanity has gone through multiple revolutions already since the we made the decision to be obsessed with the bronze revolution. And we understand other ones better too. Having more altitude on these I really think the Bronze Age is one of the weakest advancements comparatively. But it gets to be “the advent of civilization”. Agricultural revolution is way cooler and marks civilization more significantly. Between it and our current AI revolution I really think those will be the most significant two.
But agree with you. Even in now contemporary history pre Bronze Age mad advanced the human condition way too much to not be intelligent. And the exceptional groups in that time and the exceptional time periods probably did a lot more than we’d have direct evidence for.
The library is Alexandria contained huge archives of information from the previous age. It was burned for a reason.
However, the rulers if the world understand the value of knowledge and information. No doubt they recovered any information that they didn't yet possess, but it's unlikely we'll every learn of the historical facts and details they've concealed from the public.
I'm sure there's a handful of people who know the actual history of the world, or close to it.
Alexander the great was made great, because his conquests were well financed.
All major conquests are heavily financed, but the names of the financiers are rarely mentioned, nor their interests in the conquest.
Following the money almost always reveals the hidden players, and their interest. All wars have to be financed, because soldiers don't fight battles on credit. They demand hard money.
Log in
I'm certain the flood isn't a myth.
90% of the world's population lives within 50 miles if the ocean coast.
During the ice age (13000 years ago) the ocean sea level was about 350 feet lower than it's curent level, because a +5000 ft thick sheets of glaciated ice covered large regions of the northern continents. The water was frozen high-above sea level.
Continental coastlines extended for over 100 miles on the east coast, and Florida extended to the extended coast of Cuba, etc. Similar conditions existed on coast lines everywhere around the world.
A mass solar coronal ejection likely ended the ice age. High energy plasma was ejected from the sun traveled for a few days towards the earth, and darkened the sun (as viewed from earth). This ionized material would have accumulated at the magnetic poles of the earth, and generated storms of literal biblical proportions, which rained down biblically epic lightning through the poles; melting the glaciers from the bottom-up. This would dislodge then and cause biblical flooding; permanently changing the sea level and producing the coastline we recognize today.
The 90% of people living within 50 miles is the coast would not survive the flooding event, which coincided with unimaginably bad weather.
The solar plasma event wouldn't leave any significant evidence of the incident, with the exception of vitrified stone, which is identified on the around the pyramids, at various locations.
The solar storm would exceed the Carrington event by orders of magnitude, and magnetic induction would melt almost all metal that wasn't fully grounded (underground).
This would demolish the existing superiorly-advanced civilizations that existed at the time; which had already developed the technological means to build the pyramids, etc. Which we still cannot reproduce.
Atlantis likely real, as Plato documented it existed 9000 years before his time. This lines up with the end of the ice age. It's likely located under the ocean near the Canary islands.
Mysteries solved.
[Citations needed]
For which part?
I don’t think that’s too crazy. It’s pretty out there. But for things that are far out there I’d believe some of it.
Atlantis definitely existed. Sometimes real stories merge into myths. For all we know there was more than one Atlantis and myth about these cities became one.
For me a am very interested in near pre-historic history. There was so much going on with humanity then. Our most important advancements.
And the advancement of different peoples is not going to be fair at all, especially when there would be more genetic distinction back then. And a lot of that would be lost.
All we would have in the Bronze Age of this would be myth.
Civilization was far more advanced broadly in the pre Bronze Age than most realize. We see evidence of this in the level of global trade at the time. Even in the late Neolithic Northern Europe has herdsmen of reindeer and established trade villages. All the way to the near modern era you would have the village as the basic societal unit in the same area for the next ~50,000 years.
So you can’t say people then didn’t have civilization just because they didn’t have bronze, didn’t have writing that we know about, and at least in that area lived in something smaller that what could be called a “city.” The people who define a city as the definition of civilization clearly have never lived outside of one. Never mind the fact that there were plenty of cities pre-bronze age and even undiscovered ones. You point out the issue with the changing ocean level.
There has been a propaganda level effort to really push a narrative that Bronze Age Middle East really was the the start of our story.
Humanity has gone through multiple revolutions already since the we made the decision to be obsessed with the bronze revolution. And we understand other ones better too. Having more altitude on these I really think the Bronze Age is one of the weakest advancements comparatively. But it gets to be “the advent of civilization”. Agricultural revolution is way cooler and marks civilization more significantly. Between it and our current AI revolution I really think those will be the most significant two.
But agree with you. Even in now contemporary history pre Bronze Age mad advanced the human condition way too much to not be intelligent. And the exceptional groups in that time and the exceptional time periods probably did a lot more than we’d have direct evidence for.
The library is Alexandria contained huge archives of information from the previous age. It was burned for a reason.
However, the rulers if the world understand the value of knowledge and information. No doubt they recovered any information that they didn't yet possess, but it's unlikely we'll every learn of the historical facts and details they've concealed from the public.
I'm sure there's a handful of people who know the actual history of the world, or close to it.
Alexander the great was made great, because his conquests were well financed.
All major conquests are heavily financed, but the names of the financiers are rarely mentioned, nor their interests in the conquest.
Following the money almost always reveals the hidden players, and their interest. All wars have to be financed, because soldiers don't fight battles on credit. They demand hard money.