Where will we draw the line with all the A.I. and Rust and woke and retardation and intentional subversion of Linux?
Will we have to say this was the last good version? (ie. Firefox v56)
Will you let me know when there are no new good versions?
The problem is that running old software is insecure, and there are still tons of unpatched vulnerabilities that tools like Mythos have yet to find.
And...
The other problem is that new software is intentionally insecure, with the surveillance technocracy infiltrating the woken-source movement using unreliable Rust and hallucinatory A.I. Obviously an engineered crisis.
So, being aware that present software is flawed, the past is flawed, and the future is flawed - is anyone keeping track to find the optimal least-flawed version(s)?
Log in
Isn't Wayland written in Rust with AI submissions to the code base?
A lot of Linux software is moving that direction, including the kernel.
Where will we draw the line with all the A.I. and Rust and woke and retardation and intentional subversion of Linux?
Will we have to say this was the last good version? (ie. Firefox v56)
Will you let me know when there are no new good versions?
The problem is that running old software is insecure, and there are still tons of unpatched vulnerabilities that tools like Mythos have yet to find.
And...
The other problem is that new software is intentionally insecure, with the surveillance technocracy infiltrating the woken-source movement using unreliable Rust and hallucinatory A.I. Obviously an engineered crisis.
So, being aware that present software is flawed, the past is flawed, and the future is flawed - is anyone keeping track to find the optimal least-flawed version(s)?
Wayland hasn't been that bad for me, but I'm still using X because the autotype in KeepassDX doesn't work in Wayland.