Not if you don't use Roman coin. It takes a hypocrite to depend on a system gladly, and then also blame it for its injustices. If you are going to depend on USD, at least do it begrudgingly.
He asked to see the coin used for the tax. A picture of Caesar was on it so he idiotically and retardedly said that meant you should pay taxes to Caesar. Of course jesus never said that and no messianic preacher or politician today will ever get popular by telling people to pay their taxes. It's just funny that people have pad Taxes for two thousand years because of this verse, yes I think more would refuse if not for that. A picture of George Washington is on our dollar, or other founding fathers on other ones. Or on the other side a satanic eye pyramid. Jesus would say render unto Satan I guess?
Time for gold backed crypto to take over. The only problem will be infamiliar prices and very tiny fees. The transaction fees are less than what CC companies charge to move USD around (and that's just two updates to a database), but the CC companies do a good job of hiding those fees and forcing them on the merchant, which hides complexity from the consumer.
With everything moving to instacart, doordash, amazon, the five minutes for a transaction to clear is ok to fund the account. And then we could have a currency that will either go up in value if you are a saver or at least stay stable if AI cools down a little.
When you realize you've been indirectly paying $5 per transaction on every purchase you should be happy to pay $0.20 to pay the store. It's one of the reasons why portion sizes are too big in the US and or quality is poor. Think about it. If you spend $7 on lunch they need to give you some real trash to break even. They want you to spend as much money as possible per transaction to get more revenue per transaction fee. And the ingredients themselves are cheap. So they'll give you more food to intice you to spend $14. Now you are over eating and over spending. That or you can eat actual garbage that is still way more expensive than it should be. Gone is any option that is affordable, healthy, and correctly portioned. Thanks mastercard.
Why would you want a government involved? They would be the least accountable people. Who's going to hold them accountable to not disappear with the gold? The government?
When the government does its job, it protects citizens.
At the moment crypto is an ideal money laundering and pump and dump scheme, with no protections for the investor. Corporations and banks cannot be trusted to insure investments. The FDIC (1933) was necessary because of the massive corporate and bank fraud at the start of the 20th century. Any currency not protected by an independent agency put in place by elected representatives will be stolen by the wealthiest people, as we've seen.
But in reality the government shoots civilians for sport and doesn't prosecute their own. There is no accountability in government needed to secure gold and maintain its exchangability with a reciept. We've literally already tried it before. Go trade in your $1 bill for a $5,000 ounce of gold if you think government is accountable.
This discussion about insured money is very simple. The FDIC has paid investors for their lost, insured money in the past. Like other laws and agencies set up in the 1930s to deal with corruption, the FDIC helped a lot. If we want to know what it was like beforehand: we can read about US history 1800s - 1933. We can watch today the Heritage Foundation destroy the effectiveness of those New Deal agencies and laws that built a middle class in America, making it the wealthiest country in the world for decades. We can all agree that billionaires want to grift everything they can from the middle class by destroying New Deal laws and agencies. So the Fed is under attack, as are the other agencies. Would you invest in the US right now? Hell no.
When the government does its job, it protects citizens.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you.
IFIFY:
At the moment, the US dollar is an ideal money laundering and pump and dump scheme, with no protections for the investor - proven time and time again. Corporations and banks and governments cannot be trusted to insure investments - ever. All currencies not tied to precious metals put in place by elected representatives will be stolen by the wealthiest people, as we've seen.
So if we disagree, I must be compared to that guy?
If you lost $250k at an insured bank, you'd get $250k from the government. That helps the middle class and very small businesses, not the wealthy or major corporations. Correct, it doesn't cover more than $250k. The losses don't go to banks, which also lose. It reduces economic collapse. It does matter if there is insurance for your savings. Why would that not matter? Regarding 'those at the top', the FDIC was created to protect the middle class from 'those at the top', among other laws in the early 1930s. Yes, corrupt cases like Citizens United serve the ruling class, always. The Heritage Foundation are stripping way protections for the middle class and destroying them. New Deal laws of the 1930s are under attack. The Federal Reserve is under attack. Healthcare is under attack. Social Security is under attack. It seems you don't see here that we agree about corruption at the top. If an insured bank collapsed and you lost $250k, you would agree with me that an FDIC would have helped you.
If you argue like that guy and repeat like that guy then you are comparable to socks.
The New Deal was a raw deal.
The Federal Reserve is not federal and is the 3rd Central Bank - and deserves to fall, though the people don't deserve it other than for falling for it again.
Their sickcare system kills.
Social Security has always been a scam.
Who forecloses on failed businesses? Banksters.
Even Gemini knows, "Lenders, typically banks or financial institutions, foreclose on failed businesses when they default on their loans or mortgage payments. This legal process allows the lender to take ownership of the business's assets to recover the owed amounts."
Gold and silver - seem to be good investments, but they can't be exchanged easily for the weekly groceries (unless you work for The High Table and can find places that accept gold coins, but you'd have to buy $1200 - $2000 worth of groceries, which is the estimated value of each coin.)
Botcoin - maybe there are or will be grocery stores that accept bitcoin, but it's not insured and at any point you could lose all of it
Log in
Render unto Rothschild what is rothschilds
I agree. If you don't want to pay taxes, start walking away from USD.
Jesus would say pay your taxes tho
Not if you don't use Roman coin. It takes a hypocrite to depend on a system gladly, and then also blame it for its injustices. If you are going to depend on USD, at least do it begrudgingly.
He asked to see the coin used for the tax. A picture of Caesar was on it so he idiotically and retardedly said that meant you should pay taxes to Caesar. Of course jesus never said that and no messianic preacher or politician today will ever get popular by telling people to pay their taxes. It's just funny that people have pad Taxes for two thousand years because of this verse, yes I think more would refuse if not for that. A picture of George Washington is on our dollar, or other founding fathers on other ones. Or on the other side a satanic eye pyramid. Jesus would say render unto Satan I guess?
Time for gold backed crypto to take over. The only problem will be infamiliar prices and very tiny fees. The transaction fees are less than what CC companies charge to move USD around (and that's just two updates to a database), but the CC companies do a good job of hiding those fees and forcing them on the merchant, which hides complexity from the consumer.
With everything moving to instacart, doordash, amazon, the five minutes for a transaction to clear is ok to fund the account. And then we could have a currency that will either go up in value if you are a saver or at least stay stable if AI cools down a little.
When you realize you've been indirectly paying $5 per transaction on every purchase you should be happy to pay $0.20 to pay the store. It's one of the reasons why portion sizes are too big in the US and or quality is poor. Think about it. If you spend $7 on lunch they need to give you some real trash to break even. They want you to spend as much money as possible per transaction to get more revenue per transaction fee. And the ingredients themselves are cheap. So they'll give you more food to intice you to spend $14. Now you are over eating and over spending. That or you can eat actual garbage that is still way more expensive than it should be. Gone is any option that is affordable, healthy, and correctly portioned. Thanks mastercard.
Can they run it at a loss to secure it's position as a monopoly - and then hike the fees?
This is a different kind of fee. This is to miners. They don't get to set the rate. It's just the ethereum gas fee.
Would be great if there were a government prepared to back and insure crypto with gold.
Various countries are selling their US dollars, because of the unreliable and unpredictable US government.
Why would you want a government involved? They would be the least accountable people. Who's going to hold them accountable to not disappear with the gold? The government?
When the government does its job, it protects citizens.
At the moment crypto is an ideal money laundering and pump and dump scheme, with no protections for the investor. Corporations and banks cannot be trusted to insure investments. The FDIC (1933) was necessary because of the massive corporate and bank fraud at the start of the 20th century. Any currency not protected by an independent agency put in place by elected representatives will be stolen by the wealthiest people, as we've seen.
But in reality the government shoots civilians for sport and doesn't prosecute their own. There is no accountability in government needed to secure gold and maintain its exchangability with a reciept. We've literally already tried it before. Go trade in your $1 bill for a $5,000 ounce of gold if you think government is accountable.
This discussion about insured money is very simple. The FDIC has paid investors for their lost, insured money in the past. Like other laws and agencies set up in the 1930s to deal with corruption, the FDIC helped a lot. If we want to know what it was like beforehand: we can read about US history 1800s - 1933. We can watch today the Heritage Foundation destroy the effectiveness of those New Deal agencies and laws that built a middle class in America, making it the wealthiest country in the world for decades. We can all agree that billionaires want to grift everything they can from the middle class by destroying New Deal laws and agencies. So the Fed is under attack, as are the other agencies. Would you invest in the US right now? Hell no.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you.
IFIFY:
At the moment, the US dollar is an ideal money laundering and pump and dump scheme, with no protections for the investor - proven time and time again. Corporations and banks and governments cannot be trusted to insure investments - ever. All currencies not tied to precious metals put in place by elected representatives will be stolen by the wealthiest people, as we've seen.
The FDIC insures deposits in banks and savings associations for up to $250,000 per depositor.
Is there another insurer like that?
That doesn't prevent EPIC fraud and corruption.
The FDIC pays depositors when an insured bank fails, which has happened periodically since 1934.
Is there a better insurer?
(Crypto assists wealthy money launderers and fraudsters.)
You sound like socks playing a broken record.
I don't have a quarter mill, much less more. I doubt you do. That insurance isn't for us.
And what about the businesses and corporations and employers that it doesn't cover? Their losses go to the banksters.
The cycle of economic collapse is greater than parts.
It doesn't matter if there's a better insurer or not.
Everyone loses but those at the top.
It matters that the corrupt matrix of rigged systems serves the ruling class. Always.
So if we disagree, I must be compared to that guy?
If you lost $250k at an insured bank, you'd get $250k from the government. That helps the middle class and very small businesses, not the wealthy or major corporations. Correct, it doesn't cover more than $250k. The losses don't go to banks, which also lose. It reduces economic collapse. It does matter if there is insurance for your savings. Why would that not matter? Regarding 'those at the top', the FDIC was created to protect the middle class from 'those at the top', among other laws in the early 1930s. Yes, corrupt cases like Citizens United serve the ruling class, always. The Heritage Foundation are stripping way protections for the middle class and destroying them. New Deal laws of the 1930s are under attack. The Federal Reserve is under attack. Healthcare is under attack. Social Security is under attack. It seems you don't see here that we agree about corruption at the top. If an insured bank collapsed and you lost $250k, you would agree with me that an FDIC would have helped you.
If you argue like that guy and repeat like that guy then you are comparable to socks.
The New Deal was a raw deal.
The Federal Reserve is not federal and is the 3rd Central Bank - and deserves to fall, though the people don't deserve it other than for falling for it again.
Their sickcare system kills.
Social Security has always been a scam.
Who forecloses on failed businesses? Banksters.
Even Gemini knows, "Lenders, typically banks or financial institutions, foreclose on failed businesses when they default on their loans or mortgage payments. This legal process allows the lender to take ownership of the business's assets to recover the owed amounts."
Dude! I've explained the same thing four times. And fuck socks.
Notice that you're not discussing insurers. I want my money insured. If you don't, fine.
You're arguing for the city to not turn off your water as your garden hose works fine, but the entire city is on fire.
I'm saying insurance is trivial compared to entire collapse.
"I'm saying insurance is trivial compared to entire collapse."
If you had $250k, where would you put it?
Gold, silver, and bitcoin.
But MOST people do not have $250k.
AND they will be first to suffer.
Gold and silver - seem to be good investments, but they can't be exchanged easily for the weekly groceries (unless you work for The High Table and can find places that accept gold coins, but you'd have to buy $1200 - $2000 worth of groceries, which is the estimated value of each coin.)
Botcoin - maybe there are or will be grocery stores that accept bitcoin, but it's not insured and at any point you could lose all of it
Okay Captain Obvious.
Seems like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
Very socks-like.
I just noted the facts about insured banks. Nothing wrong with that.
As for gold, you'd have to protect it and exchange it before buying basic necessities.
As for bitcoin, the rich assholes we both don't trust will continue manipulating it for their purposes, and it's definitely not insured.
archive.today mirror | archive.org mirror