Have you been Mandela Effected? Do you think it is a minority of people who now live in altered reality? Or do you think it's the majority and many just aren't paying attention or are just trusting whatever they see currently?
I don't know if you know what a confusion matrix is, but what percent do you think are in each of the quadrants? If ME is real then there would have to be some number of people who have experienced it and know they have experienced it, some number who are just mistaken about the past, some number who have experienced it and are disregarding it, and some people who have never been exposed to ME and know they haven't.
My view is that either ME isn't real, or if there is some kine of quantum explanation, then those mechanics would be pervasive and there would be ME in everyone's life perhaps for some in ways that can't be perceived or that people just don't notice or refuse to. I have experienced enough shroding-bugs while programming to think that you can snap to different wave-function collapses.
We once dug up as many mandela effect examples as we could for a show. When you look at the whole lot of them, most seem likely to just be easily misremembered things. But the lack of cornucopia in the Fruit of the Loom logo makes me think at least some of it is due to the occult activities at CERN.
Sorry quick answer right now. Yes. A few months ago I brought up how the universe's consistency demonstrates that we don't live in a computer simulation (or Boltman brain for that matter) because there'd be a bazillion glitchy ones until a consistent one is reached, and @Ultrix brought the Mandela Effect to my attention then, which I had overlooked up till that point. Especially the Fruit of the Loom case has convinced me. Even though I didn't grow up with this brand. It's the evidence that's available right now, which anyone can check, that I find compelling. There is no plausible explanation for so many people remembering the cornucopia. I asked random online friends to describe it to me and they remembered the cornucopia (and I asked an open question that didn't prime them). I even saw an update being rolled out, apparently. Look at this thread on faggit. Someone finds an old video that has one shot of a newspaper that happens to catch the original logo as people remember it. Then he goes looking for that newspaper issue and turns up with this archive entry. The same issue but somehow that has the 'current reality' logo without the cornucopia, plus it says the other version with the loom is just a photoshop.
As I'm reviewing this I'm realizing that isn't quite the proof I thought it was. In the thread people bring up that it was an easter egg placed there. I disregarded that because I thought the whole youtube video was very old and not just the newspaper article. I'd need to look further into this but it seems very odd that a newspaper archive website would even make a special entry to demonstrate that the logo was the same back then and mention that the other one was photoshopped. In fact disregard that stuff, I'm just preserving this because that thread was important for me personally and so I can find it more easily in the future. But take a look at all the other evidence about Fruit of the Loom.
Regarding the confusion matrix: can you expand on category 2? Some things are real mandela effects while others are common misconceptions. So by category 2 do you mean people who are mistaken about other things, that aren't real mandela effects or what? Regardless, the biggest category is 4 and 3 is a close runner-up probably. Very few people reside in category 1, like only a few promille. I think it's even less than the IFR of covid-1984.
I may have over explained a confusion matrix and made it more complicated. It's just true positive, false positive, false negative, true negative. A confusion matrix is just the percents you're getting for each. I think the way I wrote in the 2nd category was just the false positive.
Technically that's just a sub-case of a confusion matrix because they can be used for more categories than just true and false.
But what do you think is dominating? My opinion is that either physical reality supports it or it doesn't. And so most likely either everyone is Mandela Effected and then break down into aware and unaware. Or it isn't a part of physical reality and people break down into confused and not-confused.
But who knows. Maybe the CM breaks down to 25% everywhere.
Oh yeah I forgot to make that point. The changes actually don't occur for everyone simultaneously. If you check out Jaqobian's case file about Chic-fil-a, at the 17:50 mark, he talks about people with high positions in the company listing themselves at LinkedIn as Chic-fil-a employees and he mentions eBay listings with Chic-fil-a in the title while the picture shows it as Chick.
I think you're on the right path with the quantum shit although one observation by another channel called Epic Journey Man (who mods /r/MandelaEffect) is that once a way function collapses, it stays that way, so that isn't what's happening. My point being that if you make the observation to be one way, the wave function has already collapsed, and there is no 180 on that in physics. Shroedinger's cat either dies or doesn't. That may be based on quantum mechanics, but once you make an observation, whether it's multiverse shit or just randomness in one universe, it doesn't change between the states. You implied that it does but that's not part of accepted science afaik. So is it really appropriate to map it to quantum mechanics?
Also care to tell me more about your Shroedinger bugs?
Log in
Have you been Mandela Effected? Do you think it is a minority of people who now live in altered reality? Or do you think it's the majority and many just aren't paying attention or are just trusting whatever they see currently?
I don't know if you know what a confusion matrix is, but what percent do you think are in each of the quadrants? If ME is real then there would have to be some number of people who have experienced it and know they have experienced it, some number who are just mistaken about the past, some number who have experienced it and are disregarding it, and some people who have never been exposed to ME and know they haven't.
My view is that either ME isn't real, or if there is some kine of quantum explanation, then those mechanics would be pervasive and there would be ME in everyone's life perhaps for some in ways that can't be perceived or that people just don't notice or refuse to. I have experienced enough shroding-bugs while programming to think that you can snap to different wave-function collapses.
We once dug up as many mandela effect examples as we could for a show. When you look at the whole lot of them, most seem likely to just be easily misremembered things. But the lack of cornucopia in the Fruit of the Loom logo makes me think at least some of it is due to the occult activities at CERN.
Sorry quick answer right now. Yes. A few months ago I brought up how the universe's consistency demonstrates that we don't live in a computer simulation (or Boltman brain for that matter) because there'd be a bazillion glitchy ones until a consistent one is reached, and @Ultrix brought the Mandela Effect to my attention then, which I had overlooked up till that point. Especially the Fruit of the Loom case has convinced me. Even though I didn't grow up with this brand. It's the evidence that's available right now, which anyone can check, that I find compelling. There is no plausible explanation for so many people remembering the cornucopia. I asked random online friends to describe it to me and they remembered the cornucopia (and I asked an open question that didn't prime them). I even saw an update being rolled out, apparently. Look at this thread on faggit. Someone finds an old video that has one shot of a newspaper that happens to catch the original logo as people remember it. Then he goes looking for that newspaper issue and turns up with this archive entry. The same issue but somehow that has the 'current reality' logo without the cornucopia, plus it says the other version with the loom is just a photoshop.
As I'm reviewing this I'm realizing that isn't quite the proof I thought it was. In the thread people bring up that it was an easter egg placed there. I disregarded that because I thought the whole youtube video was very old and not just the newspaper article. I'd need to look further into this but it seems very odd that a newspaper archive website would even make a special entry to demonstrate that the logo was the same back then and mention that the other one was photoshopped. In fact disregard that stuff, I'm just preserving this because that thread was important for me personally and so I can find it more easily in the future. But take a look at all the other evidence about Fruit of the Loom.
Regarding the confusion matrix: can you expand on category 2? Some things are real mandela effects while others are common misconceptions. So by category 2 do you mean people who are mistaken about other things, that aren't real mandela effects or what? Regardless, the biggest category is 4 and 3 is a close runner-up probably. Very few people reside in category 1, like only a few promille. I think it's even less than the IFR of covid-1984.
I may have over explained a confusion matrix and made it more complicated. It's just true positive, false positive, false negative, true negative. A confusion matrix is just the percents you're getting for each. I think the way I wrote in the 2nd category was just the false positive.
Technically that's just a sub-case of a confusion matrix because they can be used for more categories than just true and false.
But what do you think is dominating? My opinion is that either physical reality supports it or it doesn't. And so most likely either everyone is Mandela Effected and then break down into aware and unaware. Or it isn't a part of physical reality and people break down into confused and not-confused.
But who knows. Maybe the CM breaks down to 25% everywhere.
Oh yeah I forgot to make that point. The changes actually don't occur for everyone simultaneously. If you check out Jaqobian's case file about Chic-fil-a, at the 17:50 mark, he talks about people with high positions in the company listing themselves at LinkedIn as Chic-fil-a employees and he mentions eBay listings with Chic-fil-a in the title while the picture shows it as Chick.
I think you're on the right path with the quantum shit although one observation by another channel called Epic Journey Man (who mods /r/MandelaEffect) is that once a way function collapses, it stays that way, so that isn't what's happening. My point being that if you make the observation to be one way, the wave function has already collapsed, and there is no 180 on that in physics. Shroedinger's cat either dies or doesn't. That may be based on quantum mechanics, but once you make an observation, whether it's multiverse shit or just randomness in one universe, it doesn't change between the states. You implied that it does but that's not part of accepted science afaik. So is it really appropriate to map it to quantum mechanics?
Also care to tell me more about your Shroedinger bugs?