https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

It may seem like an odd thing to care about. But I think it might be. The 1st amendment guarantees the right to petition one's government for a redress of grievances. If something is a right the government can't require something from you as a prerequisite to access that right. They don't give you access to your forth amendment only if you first voluntarily sign up for a monthly home inspection. To have eight amendment rights you need to mail in a coupon monthly to retain it, for all the years prior to your torture.

Now one might say, "woah there, you are venturing into positive rights." I would argue that the right to petition the government is one of the few positive rights in the constitution. For you to have any meaningful petition to the government requires them to receive it. They have a positive expectation from the constitution to receive petitions.

The last thing I want to argue is to push back against the cliche and narrow meanings we've given certain words in the constitution. We've started to assign specific activities to some of these words that gained their association after the constitution was written. Arms does not mean guns. Protest does not mean a gathering in the street. A petition is not a gathering of signatures. While each of those specific activities are covered by those words, those words mean really exactly what they mean in English with the full breadth of their meaning.

I believe the constitution grants me a positive right to address the government in a meaningful way to tell them that they fucked up and are responsible for some injury. And that can be something that is common like taking taxes from me and redistributing them to a foreign country with no benefit to myself. And I should not have any requirements placed on me to access a right that is already mine.

Where my argument does fall short is that you can write a physical letter to the White House. But if it weren't for that I would argue requiring personal information to write the white house would be unconstitutional.