MatrixDevFunnyVideosMusicBooksProjectsAncapsTechEconomicsPrivacyGIFSCringeAnarchyFilmPicsThemesIdeas4MatrixAskMatrixHelpTop Subs
8
Add topics

Comment preview

[-]JasonCarswell3(+2|0)

It's not just about the "deal".
What else did you think was going to happen when you turn off the oil?
Ships that should have arrived are delayed.
Supply chains and systems have been reconfigured.
The demand felt globally is finally reaching America.

[-]x0x73(+2|0)

Trump has yet to figure out the Iran doesn't want a deal. They want the US to admit they don't have soviergnty over other countries. They want the US to realize it's only option is to go home and mind its business. Like every other country on the planet does.

[-]pumpkin3(+2|0)

Iran doesn't want to be bombed. Israel doesn't want a deal and has caused this crisis.

[-]Zapped2(+1|0)

You speak of Iran like it's still cohesive. The structure to any "leadership" is shaky.

[-]pumpkin4(+3|0)

x0: US = government (Republican/Israel/Extremist/Corrupt dictatorship disliked by 70% of the country)

me: Iran = government (Supreme Leader/Russia/China/Extremist/Corrupt dictatorship disliked by 80% of the country)

Both governments are 'leading', though not in order to help 70-80% of their constituents

[-]Zapped3(+2|0)

There are reports that there are different factions of the IRGC who are not cooperating with each other. Some factions were talking long-term "peace" with the U.S. while others were attacking ships in the gulf.

[-]Zapped2(+1|0)

I wonder if the talks are misdirection/stalling? What else could be in the works?

[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Overview:
They're Deliberately Winding Down America — Here's the Plan for What Comes Next | Simon Dixon (2:21:15) ~ Tom Bilyeu + Simon Dixon https://goatmatrix.net/c/Controligarchy/Cfm22yyrHC

What happened and why:
The Week The World Repositioned: G7, Iran, Israel, Central Banks & Bitcoin Treasury Companies (3:11:55) ~ Simon Dixon https://goatmatrix.net/c/Controligarchy/DT5Sg9kV8W

[-]RickSanchez1(+1|-1)

Trump should just bomb Iran back to the stoneage, that will set them back a few months. :)

[-]x0x74(+3|0)

Ironically you are making the point that he shouldn't. It will set them back a few months and they'll still be willing to fight. You'll have to continue to fight until you are managing their land, which we don't want. You can't punch a deranged person and then walk away when you realize you have more to live for than they do. If we have a window allowing us to walk away we should take it, and not wait on a deal to come through that doesn't even benefit us. If we got everything we asked for in these deals we'd get nothing from it. Every term just benefits Israel or Gulf countries.

[-]RickSanchez1(+1|-1)

Iran will claim it won the war if we leave. This will stir up Muslims into thinking they can beat the USA in war.

[-]Drewski4(+4|-1)

The United States launched a war of aggression against Iran and lost. Iran has a very defensible territory, similarly the US's greatest defensive asset is that it's surrounded by lots of water on all sides. It would be extremely difficult for any country to invade the US mainland. That said, we've now seen the limits of offensive US military operations and hopefully they'll reign in some of their imperialist ambitions.

[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

You could say we lost the war against taliban.... left hastily and they're in charge of their country ..... but we fucked em up for 20 years so they're less likely to mess around in the future.

I don't support it but this is real politik

[-]Drewski4(+3|0)

The Afghanistan war cost us $8 trillion, 200k dead including 4k US military. The withdrawal was a huge failure and as you say the Taliban are back in charge and stronger than ever. The only ones "messing around" were the United States and it was a disaster.

[-]newJiminy2(+1|0)

If you think it was a failure you're misunderstanding what the goal was. Check out pnac's rebuilding America's defenses. And recognize that 9/11 was a false flag. That's what I mean by real politik. They don't care about America just keeping the world's ruling families in power. If you don't like this what can be done?

[-]x0x72(+1|0)

But that means that that war was still a blunder for the American public, and it says something about our ability to win wars in that scenario regardless.

So similarly, the Iran war will be a blunder as far as our interests are concerned, and we will lose it because the same factors that encouraged our loss in Afghanistan are present in Iran and worse.

So sure, maybe the war is smart for Raytheon and the shadowy power elite. But if we are talking about our interests, it is squarely a bad idea.

[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Blunder = expensive cost to the people for huge profits for a few.

All war is class war.
The real always-war is with the ruling class is now 5GW so folks don't even realize it.

[-]newJiminy2(+1|0)

True. Man I've seen this so many times tho. People protesting against wars. What will you do about it? Vote democrat? They'll keep the wars going. Vote repubs?

[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

If voting were effective they'd make it illegal.

The rigged systemic Left-Right dialectic is a distracting waste of time, energy, and resources. The corrupt UniParty has distinguishing wings propped by wedge issues that affect few and benefit fewer while the big issues that affect everyone are ignored and roll over us all, regardless, and without consultation.

The ONLY effective solution is decentralized mass awareness and local actions for a GREAT RESIST MOVEMENT. If we fail to do that, then global digital enslavement is inevitable.

Resistance is not futile. Laying down and waiting for death is.

[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

The forever wars are lost on purpo$e.

[-]x0x72(+1|0)

The Taliban are 100% not afraid of us. The real politik is the Taliban understanding no US official would be willing to be sign for Afganistan war 2.0. The Taliban mess around currently as they please. If we think we "taught them a lesson," we are idiots that are more absorbed into our self perception of being tough than having any sense of reality.

We spend trillons of dollars and taught exactly zero lessons.

[-]Zapped2(+1|0)

I have little doubt Trump cut a deal with the Taliban during his first term. What has come out of Afghanistan since then?

[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Lithium mining?

And it wouldn't have been puppet Trump cutting the deals. The movers and shakers of the FIC, MIC, and TIC would have.

[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

They're still working on their pipeline that will transport up to 33 billion cubic meters. Hmmm.

[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

Taliban, many of them did get killed. I think they're scared enough. What did they do wrong in the first place? Ask for proof bin Laden did 9/11 before they'd say where he was? Or was it how they burned opeum fields? I bet they won't do anything like that again.

[-]x0x73(+2|0)

It's ok for Iran to win a war. When them winning a war costs us less than us winning it, we should be glad for them to win it.

To the extent that it will send a bad signal to the rest of the Muslims. Then it was really stupid to start this. And it's ok. Our experience with the Taliban already sent that signal.

So we have a choice, lose now cheaply, or lose in 20 years like we did against the Taliban expensively. We aren't going to win. When you lose against goat herders living only $1,000 a year while having a trillion dollar budget yourself, our military is built to lose. It just is. Iran's insurgency once there will be 100 times harder than the zero trained Taliban we already lost to.

[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Americans can't even win at getting healthcare for everyone.

[-]RickSanchez1(+1|-1)

Iran sells oil in exchange for weapons. Used its own citizens as suicide bombers, armed teenagers and used them as soldiers. It is like Vietnam all over again.

[-]JasonCarswell4(+3|0)

You complain about the cornered dog you keep kicking when it tries to bite your foot.

[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

What if the dog isn't in a corner and could run away but it's attacking you anyway cuz it's been trained to? Then it's ok to put them down.

[-]newJiminy3(+2|0)

This will last 20 years

[-]pumpkin2(+1|0)

Sky News 'journalist' in Israel was asked if Israel was involved in the latest strikes and he lied, saying 'no', with no mention of the way in which Israel caused the strikes from both sides.