AI bubble is about to burst. It's going to remain a helpful tool but don't listen to AI CEOs about how all humans are getting replaced. They are lying and all their companies are operating a huge loss with no plan for profitability in sight.
Even if AI becomes much more popular as we learn new ways to use and implement it, it won't cause mass lay-offs. If anything, it will probably create jobs from the innovations and information uncovered by AI.
Amazon laid off 16000 a year ago, many developers. They're now rehiring because AI broke production environments multiple times costing them hundreds of millions of dollars.
That was an honest question. People have different perspectives. According to my definition, you were wrong. You may have given me insight on a different meaning. Our interaction leaves me with a slightly new perspective, but not one that you intended.
Thats common sense and well known. Don't try to waste our time asking for proof of known facts. It's like dems denying inflation existed under Biden. So the question is why are you doing that? Do you still support trump? Why?
Financial bubbles are not technical bubbles. Just because the dot com bubble happened didn't mean the internet became less relevant.
The bubble pop has to happen in part because 95% of start ups need to fail, and we have a lot of them in AI. The bubble pop will be the moment when the losers are picked. It doesn't make the field any less relevant. It just means that the businesses that are going to fail, that were always going to fail, happen to fail around the same time as each other. But the field moves on without them.
Internet was still relevant but back before that bubble people were starting their own internet companies, there was hope it'd help economy . Economy has gotten worse since, more inequality.
Uh, your insured unemployment rate is not the same thing as the unemployment rate. No way we are at 1%. And I think newJiminy was implying is tacking on the worker non-participation rate. So he was suggesting broadening the definition, and then you gave a figure that narrows the definition even tighter to refute it.
I wouldn't even bother clicking on that govt site it's well known they always lie. Rich Sanchez exposed as a shill here. He posts fake news each day here so not shocking. Talks like a 🤖
Log in
AI bubble is about to burst. It's going to remain a helpful tool but don't listen to AI CEOs about how all humans are getting replaced. They are lying and all their companies are operating a huge loss with no plan for profitability in sight.
Data centers need a lot of electricity and water to operate; ROI is 0 when that happens. The Shareholders won't like that.
Their plan is getting taxpayers to pay for it.
Even if AI becomes much more popular as we learn new ways to use and implement it, it won't cause mass lay-offs. If anything, it will probably create jobs from the innovations and information uncovered by AI.
Already created mass layoffs
What is your definition of mass layoffs?
Amazon laid off 16000 a year ago, many developers. They're now rehiring because AI broke production environments multiple times costing them hundreds of millions of dollars.
Are they rehiring 16,000. No.
Common sense and logic, asking that shows lack of both.
Yes. Asking questions is a weakness. Only those who know it all and don't have to ask questions are the true leaders of society.
You knew answer but only asked to play dumb. Don't use that tactic anymore.
That was an honest question. People have different perspectives. According to my definition, you were wrong. You may have given me insight on a different meaning. Our interaction leaves me with a slightly new perspective, but not one that you intended.
Can't be honest question, you know what the word layoffs means. Don't try that.
"Mass layoffs". I have not heard of any layoffs in Massachusetts because of AI. Check and mate.
Thats common sense and well known. Don't try to waste our time asking for proof of known facts. It's like dems denying inflation existed under Biden. So the question is why are you doing that? Do you still support trump? Why?
I'm not so sure sense is so common between us.
Mass layoffs is common sense what it means. Stop trying to waste time over semantics, it derails conversations. You and rich Sanchez are bots.
Financial bubbles are not technical bubbles. Just because the dot com bubble happened didn't mean the internet became less relevant.
The bubble pop has to happen in part because 95% of start ups need to fail, and we have a lot of them in AI. The bubble pop will be the moment when the losers are picked. It doesn't make the field any less relevant. It just means that the businesses that are going to fail, that were always going to fail, happen to fail around the same time as each other. But the field moves on without them.
Internet was still relevant but back before that bubble people were starting their own internet companies, there was hope it'd help economy . Economy has gotten worse since, more inequality.
Learn to build.
Programming or trade building?
Real unemployment rate is 25% right now
https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
Uh, your insured unemployment rate is not the same thing as the unemployment rate. No way we are at 1%. And I think newJiminy was implying is tacking on the worker non-participation rate. So he was suggesting broadening the definition, and then you gave a figure that narrows the definition even tighter to refute it.
I wouldn't even bother clicking on that govt site it's well known they always lie. Rich Sanchez exposed as a shill here. He posts fake news each day here so not shocking. Talks like a 🤖
Fake news